<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: More Editing With Canon 5D Mark II</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.kylegilman.net/2009/03/18/more-editing-with-canon-5d-mark-ii/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.kylegilman.net/2009/03/18/more-editing-with-canon-5d-mark-ii/</link>
	<description></description>
	<lastBuildDate>Wed, 24 Feb 2010 02:59:21 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.9.2</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: Kyle</title>
		<link>http://www.kylegilman.net/2009/03/18/more-editing-with-canon-5d-mark-ii/comment-page-1/#comment-96000</link>
		<dc:creator>Kyle</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 14 Sep 2009 18:34:55 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.kylegilman.net/?p=568#comment-96000</guid>
		<description>The underlying process of editing interframe compressed codecs like H.264 is computationally difficult. You may have found a way of getting around the limitations in the software that were put there for your benefit. I&#039;d say you should do that at your own risk. It might work fine for a short-form project, but for any project longer than a couple minutes the time you save by not transcoding to a good editing codec is never worth the trouble of editing H.264 video.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>The underlying process of editing interframe compressed codecs like H.264 is computationally difficult. You may have found a way of getting around the limitations in the software that were put there for your benefit. I&#8217;d say you should do that at your own risk. It might work fine for a short-form project, but for any project longer than a couple minutes the time you save by not transcoding to a good editing codec is never worth the trouble of editing H.264 video.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Michael</title>
		<link>http://www.kylegilman.net/2009/03/18/more-editing-with-canon-5d-mark-ii/comment-page-1/#comment-95995</link>
		<dc:creator>Michael</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 12 Sep 2009 21:51:04 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.kylegilman.net/?p=568#comment-95995</guid>
		<description>I sorta stumbled upon something that seems to be too good to be true in FCP5 the other day. 
It normally wouldn&#039;t allow me to do any h264 editing of 5d footage that requires any rendering at all. I&#039;d just get an error message.
Then, I made a multiclip sequence by right-clicking on a the footage.....and, bam, I was now able to do all my editing, including rendering cross-fades and effects and have since rendered out finished projects.

Is there something I&#039;m missing?
I don&#039;t normally use multiclip sequences so......is this okay? It seems okay.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I sorta stumbled upon something that seems to be too good to be true in FCP5 the other day.<br />
It normally wouldn&#8217;t allow me to do any h264 editing of 5d footage that requires any rendering at all. I&#8217;d just get an error message.<br />
Then, I made a multiclip sequence by right-clicking on a the footage&#8230;..and, bam, I was now able to do all my editing, including rendering cross-fades and effects and have since rendered out finished projects.</p>
<p>Is there something I&#8217;m missing?<br />
I don&#8217;t normally use multiclip sequences so&#8230;&#8230;is this okay? It seems okay.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
