<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: 24p Headaches</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.kylegilman.net/2007/03/01/24p-headaches/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.kylegilman.net/2007/03/01/24p-headaches/</link>
	<description></description>
	<lastBuildDate>Sat, 04 Feb 2012 18:35:01 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Kyle</title>
		<link>http://www.kylegilman.net/2007/03/01/24p-headaches/comment-page-1/#comment-31020</link>
		<dc:creator>Kyle</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 18 Feb 2008 20:24:59 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.kylegilman.net/2007/03/01/24p-headaches/#comment-31020</guid>
		<description>I haven&#039;t worked with either of those cameras, but if both were really shot in 24p, then you need to remove pulldown from the footage of both cameras. Do not try to edit one at 29.97 and one at 23.98. You&#039;ll end up with a lot of rendering and crappy looking video. The other option is to not worry about removing pulldown at all and edit everything at 29.97. You will likely never see a difference between that and editing at 23.98.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I haven&#8217;t worked with either of those cameras, but if both were really shot in 24p, then you need to remove pulldown from the footage of both cameras. Do not try to edit one at 29.97 and one at 23.98. You&#8217;ll end up with a lot of rendering and crappy looking video. The other option is to not worry about removing pulldown at all and edit everything at 29.97. You will likely never see a difference between that and editing at 23.98.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: steve</title>
		<link>http://www.kylegilman.net/2007/03/01/24p-headaches/comment-page-1/#comment-30445</link>
		<dc:creator>steve</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 14 Feb 2008 19:55:32 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.kylegilman.net/2007/03/01/24p-headaches/#comment-30445</guid>
		<description>Great explanation of workflow that I have not found elsewhere, even in FCP forums! One problem: I understand that I have do the pulldown with my Sony V1U footage, but that&#039;s only camera B! Camera A was a Canon XH-A1 that shot at 24f. By looking at it, it does not need a pulldown and is captured at 29.97. How do I edit my camera B stuff on a 23.98 timeline and combine it with my Camera A on a 29.97 timeline all for a final export on DVD? Talk about headaches! Thanks.

Steve</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Great explanation of workflow that I have not found elsewhere, even in FCP forums! One problem: I understand that I have do the pulldown with my Sony V1U footage, but that&#8217;s only camera B! Camera A was a Canon XH-A1 that shot at 24f. By looking at it, it does not need a pulldown and is captured at 29.97. How do I edit my camera B stuff on a 23.98 timeline and combine it with my Camera A on a 29.97 timeline all for a final export on DVD? Talk about headaches! Thanks.</p>
<p>Steve</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Julie Espinosa</title>
		<link>http://www.kylegilman.net/2007/03/01/24p-headaches/comment-page-1/#comment-27485</link>
		<dc:creator>Julie Espinosa</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 06 Jan 2008 20:50:32 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.kylegilman.net/2007/03/01/24p-headaches/#comment-27485</guid>
		<description>kyle gilman, holy shit! I read this entire post *twice* (and still didn&#039;t fully understand it) before realizing that it was written by you. small world. :)</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>kyle gilman, holy shit! I read this entire post *twice* (and still didn&#8217;t fully understand it) before realizing that it was written by you. small world. <img src='http://www.kylegilman.net/wp-includes/images/smilies/icon_smile.gif' alt=':)' class='wp-smiley' /> </p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Kyle</title>
		<link>http://www.kylegilman.net/2007/03/01/24p-headaches/comment-page-1/#comment-24238</link>
		<dc:creator>Kyle</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 10 Nov 2007 21:46:03 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.kylegilman.net/2007/03/01/24p-headaches/#comment-24238</guid>
		<description>We cleared up Johannes&#039;s issue over email. It turns out the footage was not 24p advanced. It was just regular 24p. You should only have to do either step 1 or 2. Never do both.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>We cleared up Johannes&#8217;s issue over email. It turns out the footage was not 24p advanced. It was just regular 24p. You should only have to do either step 1 or 2. Never do both.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Johannes</title>
		<link>http://www.kylegilman.net/2007/03/01/24p-headaches/comment-page-1/#comment-24209</link>
		<dc:creator>Johannes</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 10 Nov 2007 06:25:48 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.kylegilman.net/2007/03/01/24p-headaches/#comment-24209</guid>
		<description>So, I&#039;m editing a project shot on the DVX100 in Advanced 24P mode. 
As I understand it my work flow should be...

1. capture DV NTSC - (2:3,3:2) removal
2. reverse telecine all clips in Cinema tools
3. bring all the fixed clips into a 23.98 sequence for editing

Thus far, I have done a test this way and I have gotten all progressive  frames that I can view on my DVNTSC deck.  So cool.

I wonder about delivery format though.  Assuming I continue this route; what output formats will be available to me? Video for DVD? And will film be possible?

thanks!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>So, I&#8217;m editing a project shot on the DVX100 in Advanced 24P mode.<br />
As I understand it my work flow should be&#8230;</p>
<p>1. capture DV NTSC &#8211; (2:3,3:2) removal<br />
2. reverse telecine all clips in Cinema tools<br />
3. bring all the fixed clips into a 23.98 sequence for editing</p>
<p>Thus far, I have done a test this way and I have gotten all progressive  frames that I can view on my DVNTSC deck.  So cool.</p>
<p>I wonder about delivery format though.  Assuming I continue this route; what output formats will be available to me? Video for DVD? And will film be possible?</p>
<p>thanks!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Neil Sadwelkar</title>
		<link>http://www.kylegilman.net/2007/03/01/24p-headaches/comment-page-1/#comment-12555</link>
		<dc:creator>Neil Sadwelkar</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 03 Jun 2007 18:34:57 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.kylegilman.net/2007/03/01/24p-headaches/#comment-12555</guid>
		<description>I work in a PAL coutry which makes lots of films. All shot at 24 fps and edited at 25 converted to 24 in Avid and FCP systems.

I&#039;ve tried to simplify this on my blog here...
http://neilsadwelkar.blogspot.com/2007/02/this-24-25-issue-in-pal-film-editing.html</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I work in a PAL coutry which makes lots of films. All shot at 24 fps and edited at 25 converted to 24 in Avid and FCP systems.</p>
<p>I&#8217;ve tried to simplify this on my blog here&#8230;<br />
<a href="http://neilsadwelkar.blogspot.com/2007/02/this-24-25-issue-in-pal-film-editing.html" rel="nofollow">http://neilsadwelkar.blogspot.com/2007/02/this-24-25-issue-in-pal-film-editing.html</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

